OK – I recently re-watched the “9/11 truth” episode of South Park, and it got me thinking about the 9/11 conspiracy theories that I’ve seen over the years. Some of them appear quite convincing, and I think that for a time, it was even popular for high school students (perhaps even including myself) to do up reports on the possible theories and spell America with three ‘K’s instead of a ‘C’.. at least, my reality removed teachers gave me ‘A’s for such reports.
Anyhow, since “911truth.org” was featured in the episode of South Park, I checked out their site and quickly stumbled upon this article which was apparently censored by “them”.
Now, call me elitist or overly sceptical, but I just can’t take anything as poorly written as this article seriously. I haven’t been in school for a while, but – at least to me – these seem like really elementary mistakes that a journalist certainly would not make. The insure / ensure one particularly.
Here’s a few mistakes that I noticed:
All [of] these would require public debate and [the] participation of Congress.
Canada’s influential Department of National Defence; its new Chief of Defence Staff, General Rick Hillier; and Defense Minister Gordon O’Connor are on board as well.
1 US policy seeks to insure America gets unlimited access to Canada water as well.
… when I got to that last one, I stopped reading. Perhaps there’s a good reason that these “articles” aren’t proof read: I’m guessing that the target audience is largely uneducated and ignorant and wont notice anyway, and anyone who would notice such mistakes is obviously not stupid enough to believe this dribble anyhow.The occaisional slip up I can take, gradeschool level homonym confusion – no, sorry, “your stupid”.